<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Double Astrono-Whammy of Exoplanet Finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/13/a-double-astrono-whammy-of-exoplanet-finds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/13/a-double-astrono-whammy-of-exoplanet-finds/</link>
	<description>sarahaskew.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: When you&#8217;ve seen one planet&#8230;. &#171; In the Dark</title>
		<link>http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/13/a-double-astrono-whammy-of-exoplanet-finds/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>When you&#8217;ve seen one planet&#8230;. &#171; In the Dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahaskew.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-226</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, actually, we knew that. We live on one. And anyway, the International Astronomical Union recently stipulated that planets could only be things orbiting the Sun.  Don&#8217;t ask me why. So the new things have to be called exoplanets. And over 300 hundred of these were known before today anyway.  A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, so we won&#8217;t worry about the taxonomy. But what&#8217;s the big deal? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, actually, we knew that. We live on one. And anyway, the International Astronomical Union recently stipulated that planets could only be things orbiting the Sun.  Don&#8217;t ask me why. So the new things have to be called exoplanets. And over 300 hundred of these were known before today anyway.  A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, so we won&#8217;t worry about the taxonomy. But what&#8217;s the big deal? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

