<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cosmic ray signature of dark matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/24/the-cosmic-ray-signature-of-dark-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/24/the-cosmic-ray-signature-of-dark-matter/</link>
	<description>sarahaskew.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lfmorgan</title>
		<link>http://sarahaskew.net/2008/11/24/the-cosmic-ray-signature-of-dark-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>lfmorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahaskew.wordpress.com/?p=364#comment-231</guid>
		<description>my theory says the problematics of current best-predictive theory blinds us to electron emissive detaI at the individual pulse level per E = nhf,   and that we anthropic-default  measure with n =1/h, where n is the number of electrons traveling in pulse parallel---way too gross to base yours or anyone else&#039;s theory on using the term &quot;electron&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my theory says the problematics of current best-predictive theory blinds us to electron emissive detaI at the individual pulse level per E = nhf,   and that we anthropic-default  measure with n =1/h, where n is the number of electrons traveling in pulse parallel&#8212;way too gross to base yours or anyone else&#8217;s theory on using the term &#8220;electron&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

