Expecting to Fly (Let’s Get On With It)

JWST full scale model at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Institute (Image: NASA)

 

For 4 years, I’ve been a member of a team that will deliver part of the biggest ever astronomical space mission: the James Webb Space Telescope. In just a few weeks’ time, we’ll begin testing the flight hardware for MIRI, the telescope’s mid-infrared instrument, that will allow it to peer deeper into dense dusty and cold regions of our Galaxy and the Universe than its three fellow instruments. “Flight hardware” means that these are the actual bits and pieces that will be launched into space on board an Ariane rocket. Yes, that’s seriously cool.

My four years on the team makes MIRI my longest relationship in science yet. I’m rather fond of the little tyke. But four years is nothing in today’s era of mega-science. Literally hundreds of people have had a relationship with some part of the James Webb mission for well over a decade. Some may well be approaching their silver anniversary. Those of you with instrumentation experience know well what this means: meetings, documents, designs, documents, simulations, telecons, more meetings, reviews, procurement, manufacturing, testing, negotiations, documents, meetings. Endless, over and over.

[Read more...]

Top 5 Awesome Things About the Webb Telescope

This video about JWST is excellent! At a recent MIRI meeting I was asked to convey my excitement about JWST for a video by Space telescope Science Institute – sadly my nerd cool proficiency level is some orders of magnitude below that of Vlogbrothers. I sure wish we could get them to .Astronomy in April :-)

I’ve posted quite a bit about JWST now – see everything here.

Remembering remembering Challenger

Last week, the world remembered the loss of the space shuttle Challenger. Challenger exploded shortly after launch on January 28, 1986, and like many, I remember seeing the explosion on television – very vaguely, as I was only 5 – presumably on the evening news. The Challenger disaster brings a double layer of remembrance. Around the 15th anniversary of the accident, I was in my final year of university, and after 3 years of studying physics and astronomy I was exploring some new interests: engineering and science writing. I took a course in science writing in UCL’s Department of Science and Technology Studies, taught by Jon Turney. Incidentally, this was against the advice of the astronomy course tutors, who warned me that these courses would drag down my grades and jeopardise a potential PhD spot – but I think that worked out ok in the end, and it was one of the most fun things I did at UCL.  I wrote this sort piece on the Challenger accident for one of the course assignments, and I thought I’d post it up here – remembering myself a decade ago, remembering Challenger a quarter of a century ago.

“Uh-oh”. Those were the last recorded words of Michael J. Smith, pilot of the space shuttle Challenger, before the craft’s  explosion killed him and the other six astronauts on board. That was fifteen years ago, on January 28, 1986. It was the twenty-fifth shuttle flight ever, and the first of the fifteen that were scheduled that year. 1986 was to be the busiest year in the history of human space flight. After the success of the Apollo, Mercury and Gemini missions and twenty-four clean shuttle flights, NASA’s self-esteem was at an all-time high. And management was determined to maintain the impressive track record they had established, at any cost. The cost, as it turned out, was seven lives.

[Read more...]

Looking over Enceladus

This stunning picture taken by the Cassini spacecraft was tweeted yesterday by Carolyn Porco, the leader of the Cassini imaging team, and I thought I’d share it here. Taken late last year, the image shows a close-up of Saturn’s moon Enceladus, with Saturn’s rings visible in the background. More info is given in the official caption at Cassini imaging hub Ciclops:

Cassini looks over cratered and tectonically deformed terrain on Saturn’s moon Enceladus as the camera also catches a glimpse of the planet’s rings in the background of this image from the spacecraft’s flyby of the moon on Nov. 30, 2010. Geologically young terrain in the middle latitudes of the moon gives way to older, cratered terrain in the northern latitudes. See PIA11685 to learn more. This view is centered on terrain at 41 degrees north latitude, 202 degrees west longitude. North on Enceladus (504 kilometers, 313 miles across) is up and rotated 28 degrees to the right. This view looks toward the northern, sunlit side of the rings from less than a degree above the ringplane. The image was taken in visible light with the Cassini spacecraft narrow-angle camera. The view was acquired at a distance of approximately 46,000 kilometers (29,000 miles) from Enceladus and at a Sun-Enceladus-spacecraft, or phase, angle of 14 degrees. Image scale is 276 meters (905 feet) per pixel.

Nice!

Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

Credit where it’s due?

The Andromeda Galaxy in optical, IR and X-ray

Earlier this week, this amazing image of M31, the Andromeda galaxy, was splashed all over the media and the inernet. The image is a composite of optical, infrared and X-ray data, with the infrared image coming from the Herschel space telescope, launched in 2009. The picture has been featured and discussed in the media all week – rightly so, as it’s stunning. With Herschel, we can finally showcase far-infrared and submillimetre images that are just as beautiful as those produced at shorter wavelengths with Hubble, or VLT on the ground. Moreover, observing galaxies at these wavelengths at the level of detail enabled by Herschel is opening some big new windows onto the physics that governs the Universe, from right on our doorstep to billions of lightyears away. What I’m saying, if that wasn’t yet clear, is that this telescope is something to be very proud of.

The Daily Mail, however, decided to take a different approach – one that both misses the point, and is plain wrong. It sets the Herschel image side by side with an optical image of Andromeda, taken by British amateur astronomer Steve Loughran, and asks:

“One of these pictures was taken in a British back garden by an amateur using kit worth £10,000 – the other cost Nasa millions. But can you tell the difference?”