Astronomy Exchange

The Western world’s ongoing financial woes are providing food for thought for all of us on the pros, cons, opportunities and dangers of a market-based economy. In the face of financial austerity that’s biting into education and research grant budgets, universities and research institutes are under increasing pressure to look for alternative sources of income from education and research, through charging fees for education, focusing on “impact” science  with real-world applications, and generating funds from that research through spin-offs and intellectual property.

One of the first people I met at SciFoo was Elizabeth Iorns, a cancer researcher at the University of Miami, who had recently relocated to the land of science milk and tech honey, Palo Alto, to launch a start-up company that aims to help labs maximise the return from their experimental equipment, and help others gain access to equipment they don’t have available in their own labs. The website for Science Exchange launched a couple of weeks ago and got some nice coverage from Nature. On the site, scientists can advertise their projects, and others can bid on them to do the work, leading to the nickname “an eBay for science”.

There’s some aspects to the system that aren’t all that clear to me, but it’s certainly a great idea and I look forward to hearing how it goes.

[Read more...]

Funding people, not projects

Today I attended a talk by Prof. Cornelis van Bochove, who was appointed as Professor of Science Policy Studies at Leiden University in February last year. Van Bochove has had an interesting career: after a number of years in econometrics research, he became Director of the Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics for 5 years until 1999, after that Director of Research and Science Policy at the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science until 2007. In those years he apparently always showed a keen interest in astronomy and was a strong supporter of the Dutch astronomy community, which has a long history of international excellence. Rather than hang up his hat, van Bochove joined Leiden to go back to the bench. The focus of his research is “evidence-based science policy”. So he’s looking at the science behind funding science. A bit of a brain twister, I know. But the talk turned out to be very interesting, and a little bit surreal. [Read more...]

Science kudos for Obama

US President-elect Barack Obama has been appointing some excellent people to advise him on all things scientific during his presidency. His latest appointment, John Holdren, to the post of director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has been met with particular joy from the scientific community, as Holdren is a physicist and leading expert on climate change. Hurrah!

Read more in The Guardian here, or the New York Times here. Phil Plait has some opinions on Obama’s appointments and the future of NASA under his administration.

UPDATE: Obama’s weekly address on YouTube of 20 December was actually about his science policy and appointments, watch it below. Sounds good!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMlXNrBxM0g]